Quantcast

Charleston Reporter

Thursday, October 17, 2024

South Carolina, Wisconsin introduce legislation to address political censorship by social media companies

Bermix studio vbljpz0kdus unsplash

A Pew Research Study found that 73% of Americans believe that it is very or somewhat likely that social media tech companies are intentionally censoring opinions they disagree with. | Unsplash/Bermix Studio

A Pew Research Study found that 73% of Americans believe that it is very or somewhat likely that social media tech companies are intentionally censoring opinions they disagree with. | Unsplash/Bermix Studio

South Carolina and Wisconsin residents are part of a growing majority of the nation's population concerned about the size of technology companies, and the influence they exert over the government.

According to a study by Pew Research Center, a majority of Americans — some 56% — said they believe that major technology companies should be more heavily regulated than they currently are, compared to 47% of people in 2020, and 51% in 2018. 

Of those involved in the most recent study, 68% said they believe that major technology companies have more power and influence than they should. 

Another Pew study found that most Americans believe social media sites attempt to censor political viewpoints. 

The study found that 73% of Americans believe that it is very (37%) or somewhat (36%) likely that social media tech companies are intentionally censoring opinions they disagree with. 

Only 25% of Americans said they believe this is not likely. 

Among Republicans, 90% said they believe it is likely that social media sites censor viewpoints.

South Carolina state Rep. Mike Burns (R-Greenville) has introduced new legislation to stop social media censorship. 

Dubbed the Stop Social Media Censorship Act, H. 3450 would ban social media companies from censoring the comments, posts, or shares of an individual who is not calling for violence, posting obscene material, bullying minors, or urging criminal conduct.

“Young people are supposed to be able to get exposed to both sides of the argument and they’re short-circuiting the process,” Burns told online publication Conservative Firing Line. “We want everyone to be heard. Every single day or two we hear about someone’s point of view getting cut off.”

In Wisconsin, state Sen. Julian Bradley has introduced a bill — LRB 337/1 — which would compel technology companies to reveal their algorithms and outline the reasoning for who gets censored and who can post freely on Facebook and Twitter, The Center Square reported.

"It's time to ensure that (Facebook's) Mark Zuckerberg and his Silicon Valley liberal allies cannot restrict Wisconsinites' political speech," Bradley told The Center Square. "Free expression is one of the most vital components of our democratic republic. We must ensure our citizens can engage in political speech unfiltered and uncensored by Big Tech. 

"It's time for Facebook and Twitter to consistently and fairly enforce their own rules."

The Pew study on social media censoring found that Americans who have heard more about debates regarding the regulation of tech companies are far more likely to support regulations against big tech than less informed individuals — 69% vs. 42%.

The biggest jump in support for more regulation was among liberal Democrats, which jumped from 52% to 70% since last year. 

Moderate or liberal Republicans were the only groups that showed no statistically significant increase in support for more regulations.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate